Legal Opinion

Smith v. Amerada Petroleum Corporation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1965No. 8219PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUTZ, Justice.

On August 11, 1949, Maryan Sather, a widow, and Oscar Sather, a single man, executed an oil and gas lease covering certain properties in Mountrail County. The properties covered by this lease consisted of two noncontiguous parcels totaling 640 acres. The lease executed by the Sathers contained an entirety clause, which was in the following words:

“Id. If the leased premises shall hereafter be owned in severalty, or in separate tracts, the premises nevertheless, shall be developed and operated as one lease and all royalties accruing hereunder shall be treated as an entirety and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garnick v. SerewitchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Jester v. JesterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. BURLEIGH CTY. BD. OF COMM'RSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Schroeder v. Burleigh County Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Froemke v. HauffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Froemke v. HauffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API