Legal Opinion

Froemke v. Hauff

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1966No. 8295Published

1Opinion of the Court

147 N.W.2d 390 (1966)

Allen FROEMKE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Elmer HAUFF, Defendant and Appellant, and

DuWayne Kuehn, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 8295.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

November 15, 1966.

Nilles, Oehlert, Hansen, Selbo & Magill, Fargo, and Holand & Stetson, Lisbon, for plaintiff and respondent.

Wattam, Vogel, Vogel, Bright & Peterson, Fargo, for defendant and appellant Elmer Hauff.

Conmy, Conmy, Rosenberg & Lucas, Bismarck, for defendant and respondent DuWayne Kuehn.

ERICKSTAD, Judge (on reassignment).

The defendant Elmer Hauff appeals from the order of the District Court of Sargent…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Grenz v. WerreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Stetson v. Investors Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Lake v. NeubauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Degenstein Ex Rel. Degenstein v. EhrmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API