Legal Opinion

Pettingill v. Kelton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 2, 1965No. 1230PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C. J.

This appeal concerns the ■ authority of the trial court to unconditionally increase the jury’s award of damages in this action of negligence. The issue developed from a highway accident on December 15, 1958, in the town of Royalton, Vermont: The plaintiff’s evidence indicated that his tractor-trailer unit was forced to leave the highway when it was overtaken by a tractor-trailer owned by the defendant Kelton and operated by his co-defendant, Blanchard.

At the close of all the evidence, the plaintiff moved for a directed verdict on the issue of liability. The question of damages was not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  3. Smith v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  4. Parizo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  5. Collins v. FoggSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wells v. Village of Orleans, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  2. D'Arc Turcotte v. Estate of LaRoseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Proctor Trust Co. v. Upper Valley Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  4. Hoague v. CotaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. Quesnel v. RaleighSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API