Legal Opinion

Schaer v. Little Rock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 25, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

This is a suit in mandamus 'by appellants to compel appellees to pass an ordinance creating a street improvement district out of certain territory within the city of Little Boclc.

Appellants are property owners within the proposed district, and petitioned the city council of Little Book, under § 5649 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest, to lay off the territory described in their petition into a street improve^ ment district, which the city council declined to do, after hearing testimony introduced for and against the creation of the district. The section of the Digest referred to is as follows:

“When…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Little Rock v. KatzensteinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BelcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  3. Little Rock v. BoulliounSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  4. Paving District No. 36 v. LittleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Feldhake v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API