Faulkner v. Hendy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco retaxing costs after judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
Action for the dissolution of a partnership, and for an accounting. Judgment for the plaintiff, dissolving the partnership, and for the sum of $35,254.24. As to the costs, it was provided in the decree that “ the costs of said action be divided between said parties, and adjusted hereafter.” Subsequently the plaintiff filed his cost bill, in' which was included an item of $4,570, amount expended by him in payment of one Julius Reimer, an accountant. The defendant moved the court to retax the costs, and to strike out the whole of this item, upon the ground, among others, that it was not a legal…
2Cited by16 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Miller v. Highland Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Davis v. KGO-T v. Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Rabinowitch v. Cal. Western Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.