Legal Opinion

Shackleford v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 9, 1955No. 44592PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COIL, Commissioner.

Mary and Helen Shackleford have appealed from a judgment denying them relief in the nature of specific performance of an alleged contract between the Crawfords (husband and wife) to make irrevocable, mutual and reciprocal wills. We shall re fer to the parties as they were designated in the trial court.

Plaintiffs were the nieces of George K. Crawford, deceased. Frances H. Crawford, deceased, was George’s wife and defendant, Thomas H. Edwards, was Frances’s son by a former marriage. The Crawfords married when George was in his 50’s. He had a strong dislike for his stepson. .…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Plemmons v. PembertonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Stewart v. SheltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. Beveridge v. BaileySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Howells v. MartinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
  5. Wallace v. WallaceNew York Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fisher v. MiceliSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Ray v. RayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. McIntyre v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Lindley v. LindleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Wimp v. CollettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API