Legal Opinion

Highland v. Bracken

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 6, 1990No. 4-90-0047PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH

Third-party defendants, Steven Williams and the City of Mattoon (hereinafter referred to as third-party defendants), appeal a trial court’s order denying a motion for summary judgment regarding a third-party contribution action. Third-party defendants contend the contribution action was barred by the one-year statute of limitations contained in section 8 — 101 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Immunity Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 85, par. 8—101).

On May 20, 1987, defendant, Mary Bracken, travelled on a green light west through an intersection,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rakowski v. LucenteIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hayes v. Mercy Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Laue v. LeifheitIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hupp v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Stephens v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. McKenzieIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Robert B. Kaplan v. Shure Brothers, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Arnold Weinberg, of Katz Randall & Weinberg, and Katz Randall & WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Illinois State Toll Highway Authority v. Amoco Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Thompson v. WaltersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. People v. Asbestospray Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API