Commonwealth v. Babb
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
Defendant was convicted before a magistrate of violating the Public Utility Law by operating a motor vehicle as a common carrier without a certificate of public convenience. He was fined $25 and costs. On appeal to the court below the case was tried de novo without a jury. Defendant offered no testimony, his demur rer to the evidence was overruled, and his motion for a directed verdict was denied. He was convicted, and this appeal followed. The sole question for us is whether the Commonwealth showed by sufficient competent evidence that defendant was guilty of the offense…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. IsraelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Roberts v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. GornishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KoczwaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Commonwealth v. Cherrington, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Columbia County1970
- Commonwealth v. KulbDauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1951
- Lowman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Williams v. LimpertDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2008