Legal Opinion

Sioux City Brick & Tile Co. v. Employment Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 20, 1989No. 88-1778PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.

Upon judicial review of a decision of the Employment Appeal Board (EAB), the district court reversed the action of the agency. Because we believe the district court erred, we reverse and remand.

I. Background facts and proceedings. Prior to May 1983, Thompson, Ruring, Palmer, Ingalls and McCarthy (the claimants) were employed by Ballou Brick Company, which was then a subsidiary of Sioux City Brick & Tile Company. The two companies merged in January 1987. Because Sioux City Brick & Tile is the successor of Ballou, we will refer to it as the claimants’ employer.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norland v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  2. Christie v. Rolscreen Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Iowa Department of Transportation Regulations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Des Moines v. City Development Board of the StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. IBP, Inc. v. HarpoleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. Jeremie J. Cooksey v. Cargill Meat Solutions CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. AFSCME/Iowa Council 61 v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. Sharp v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API