Legal Opinion
MECHDYNE CORP. v. Garwood
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided October 21, 2009No. 4:08-cv-00451PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES E. GRITZNER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment by Counterclaim Defendant Meehdyne Corporation (Meehdyne) and Third-Party Defendant Chris Clover (Clover) (collectively, Mechdyne), which Plaintiff Donald J. Garwood (Garwood) resists. The Court conducted a hearing on the motion on August 13, 2009. Attorney Steve Doohen represented Garwood; attorney Kerrie Murphy represented Clover; and attorney David Swinton represented Meehdyne. The matter is fully submitted and ready for disposition.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The following facts are either…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Floyd L. Roberson v. Hayti Police Department Paul Sheckell, Lt. Chris RiggsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sires v. Tyson Foods, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2024