Legal Opinion
Hazle v. McDonald
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 21, 1969No. 17336PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATEMAN, Justice.
The appellant King R. Hazle sued the appellee John D. McDonald for damages for fraudulently inducing him to enter into-a contract. McDonald was granted summary judgment, and Hazle appeals claiming there were genuine fact issues.
Hazle alleged that while he was considering a contract with Electronic Exercise Corporation to become a distributor of a certain weight reducing device he discussed the matter with McDonald, the inventor and manufacturer of the device, who took him on a tour of the place where the devices were assembled and told him that the response to the machine was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Cochran v. Wool Growers Central Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- James T. Taylor & Son, Inc. v. Arlington Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Kuper v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Valley Stockyards Company v. KinselTexas Supreme Court · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fredonia Broadcasting Corporation, Inc. v. Rca CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- William B. Roberts, Inc. v. McDrilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Neuhaus v. KainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Garcia v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Stone v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.