Legal Opinion

(PC) Sarukhanyan v. Berry

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 22, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01091Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARAM SARUKHANYAN, No. 1:24-cv-01091-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 DOROTHEA BERRY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION 15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 18, 19) 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on September 13, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) 20 On November 15, 2024, the Court screened…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API