Meyer v. Kaplan

This proceeding was decided, prior to our decision in Matter of Bucalo v. Kaplan (19 A D 2d 478), on the grounds that the notice indicating the scope of the present examination was too broad and indefinite and did not adequately apprise the candidate of the nature of the test. In Bucalo, in a similar factual situation we found, as we find here, that the notice indicating the scope of the examination was adequate.

The other issue raised, but not decided by Special Term, relates to the rating factors and we concern ourselves with this phase of the examination.

About the only logical complaint…