Legal Opinion

Brabham v. Brabham

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 31, 1966No. 5-3756PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Osro Cobb, Justice.

This, case reaches us on appeal from a decree of the Chancellor, pendente lite, awardingappellee $350 per month for the.support of herself and child during the pendency of her action for divorce. Said allowance falls within the statutory authority of Ark. Stat; Ann. § 34-1210 (Repl. 1962). Appellate review of the decree providing such ad interim support is fully authorized. See Casteel v. Casteel, 38 Ark. 477; Glenn v. Glenn, 44 Ark. 46.

The appellant argues three grounds for reversal of the decree.

“(1) Appellee failed to prove a prima facie case for divorce.(2) Voluntary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Casteel v. CasteelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  2. Slocum v. SlocumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Glenn v. GlennSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  5. Denison v. DenisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hatcher v. HatcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. Wilson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974
  4. Hatcher v. HatcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API