Brabham v. Brabham
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Osro Cobb, Justice.
This, case reaches us on appeal from a decree of the Chancellor, pendente lite, awardingappellee $350 per month for the.support of herself and child during the pendency of her action for divorce. Said allowance falls within the statutory authority of Ark. Stat; Ann. § 34-1210 (Repl. 1962). Appellate review of the decree providing such ad interim support is fully authorized. See Casteel v. Casteel, 38 Ark. 477; Glenn v. Glenn, 44 Ark. 46.
The appellant argues three grounds for reversal of the decree.
“(1) Appellee failed to prove a prima facie case for divorce.(2) Voluntary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Casteel v. CasteelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
- Slocum v. SlocumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Glenn v. GlennSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Denison v. DenisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hatcher v. HatcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Wilson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974
- Hatcher v. HatcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979