Glenn v. Glenn
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Pulaski Chancery Court. Hon. H. W. Carroll, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtEakin, J.
This is an appeal in a divorce, suit, by the husband, from an order allowing the wife alimony for maintenance and counsel fees, pendente lite. The cause below is still pending. A supersedeas bond has been filed.
Counsel upon both sides have declined to aid us with briefs, and the pressure of business upon the court is too great to justify us in patient microscopic searches after error, through the whole transcript.
If it bethought that the deoree for alimony pendente lite is not final, and therefore not subject to appeal, are referred to the case of Hecht v. Hecht, 28 Ark,, 92, where the point…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Lesh v. LeshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1903
- Gladfelter v. GladfelterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Slocum v. SlocumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Gibbons v. BradleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Shirey v. ShireySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.