Radebaugh v. Scanlan
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Rush Circuit Court; Will M. Sparhs, Judge. Suit by Elizabeth Radebaugh against Michael Scanlan. From a decree for defendant on his cross-complaint, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRabb, J.
The appellant brought this suit in the court below for the partition of lot twenty-four in Smith & Carr’s addition to the city of Rushville, claiming to be the owner of the undivided one-third thereof by virtue of her marital right as the widow of John S. Radebaugh. The appellee filed several paragraphs of answer to this complaint, and also a cross-complaint. The cross-complaint alleged that on October 23, 1866, John S. Radebaugh was the husband of the plaintiff, and was at the time the owner of the lot in question, and that on said day said John S. Radebaugh and plaintiff sold and attempted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Woodward v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Goodwine v. CadwalladerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- McComas v. HaasIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Abendroth v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ligon Specialized Hauler, Inc. v. HottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Shedd v. American Maize Products Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corp. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1992
- Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Adams, Rowe & NormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Hay, Admr. v. BilleterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.