Legal Opinion
MacDonald v. Hayner
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 6, 1986No. 13156-7-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
The plaintiffs, attorneys Kenneth A. MacDonald and Mary Ruth Mann, appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claim against the Washington State Senate for services rendered. Under theories of modification, quantum meruit, equitable estoppel, and implied contract, they seek compensation at several times the $10,000 limit set in their written contract with the State. We affirm the dismissal.
Facts
This case arises out of plaintiffs' contract with the Washington State Senate to conduct a preliminary inquiry and prepare a written report on the Issaquah class ferry contracts. The contract,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Yakima Fruit & Cold Storage Co. v. Central Heating & Plumbing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
- Wagner v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- McNeal v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Martin v. TriolWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Official Comm. Unsecured Creditors of HH Liquidation, LLC v. Comvest Grp. Holdings, LLC (In re HH Liquidation, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Caraang v. PNC MortgageDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Ruiz v. FernandezDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2013
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ChungDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.