Scogin v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendant previously moved to dismiss on the basis that a district court order granting the United States access to plaintiffs property did not state a claim for a taking. With its reply and cross-motion, defendant submitted a copy of a lease whereby plaintiff and a government contractor agreed upon compensation to plaintiff for allowing access to the subject property. Before ruling on defendant’s motion to dismiss and cross-motion for summary judgment, the court ordered plaintiff to file an amended…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Waverley View Investors, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Waverley View Investors, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018