Legal Opinion

Scogin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 16, 1995No. 94-1068LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendant previously moved to dismiss on the basis that a district court order granting the United States access to plaintiffs property did not state a claim for a taking. With its reply and cross-motion, defendant submitted a copy of a lease whereby plaintiff and a government contractor agreed upon compensation to plaintiff for allowing access to the subject property. Before ruling on defendant’s motion to dismiss and cross-motion for summary judgment, the court ordered plaintiff to file an amended…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waverley View Investors, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  2. Waverley View Investors, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API