Legal Opinion

American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Ringling Bros. & Barnum & Bailey Circus

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 4, 2003No. 01-7166PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:

Asian elephants perform at the Ringling Bros, and Barnum & Bailey Circus. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the Animal Welfare Institute, the Fund for Animals, and Thomas Rider sued Ringling Bros, and its owner, Feld Entertainment, Inc., claiming that Asian elephants are an endangered species and that the circus mistreated its elephants in violation of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. The only question is whether, as the district court ruled in dismissing their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Roeder v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  2. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  3. Al-Aulaqi v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Feld Entertainment, Inc. v. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Sierra Club v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API