Legal Opinion

United States v. Bridges

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided August 19, 1987No. ACM 25941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

On the evening of 25 February 1986, Arturo Sealy, the appellant’s brother-in-law, was admitted to the University of Califomia-Davis Medical Hospital with multiple knife wounds to the chest, thigh and hand. This appeal centers upon the admissibility of pretrial statements by him and the appellant’s wife, Camille Bridges, made pursuant to the residual hearsay exception of Mil.R.Evid. 803(24) and 804(b)(5) identifying the appellant as the attacker. For the reasons stated in this opinion we hold the statements were properly admitted.

The record established that around…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. HinesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. BarrorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. CraytonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. WhalenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
  5. United States v. HubbardU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. LingleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. HughesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. OrtizU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. PabonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. UretaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API