Legal Opinion

Helmer v. Krolick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Ionia Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, Ch. J:

Several interesting questions of law were discussed in this case, but in the view we take of the facts they cannot affect the decision.

The bill was filed to restrain the collection of a mortgage on complainant’s lands, given by herself and her husband to secure the payment of a promissory note of four hundred and fifty-five dollars, made by Benjamin Helmer, the husband, payable to defendant Krolick, and which defendant Hill is now seeking to enforce. The grounds of relief which are relied upon are, that the note was given on a loan by Krolick to Helmer of three hundred and fifty…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mattison v. MarksMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Dutton v. IvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. FlathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  2. West Coast Lumber Co. v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Pape v. HartwigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Adams v. AddingtonUnited States Circuit Court · 1883
  5. McKenna v. KirkwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API