Legal Opinion

Regents of the University v. Turner

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1911No. Sac. No. 1710PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial. The plaintiff sues to foreclose a mortgage on real estate and to obtain judgment upon the note given for the debt secured thereby. The note and mortgage were executed by W. C. Turner. The Merced Security Savings Bank is the owner of a part of the mortgaged premises by title acquired after the execution of said mortgage. The defendant bank answered that the action was barred by the provisions of sections 318, 319, 337, 343, 1493, and 1500, of the Code of Civil Procedure. The administratrix alleges that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hall v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Tankersly v. PettisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  3. Johnson v. German America Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Regents of University v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. In Re Estate of TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte OwensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Petition of FullerNevada Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Central Pacific Railway Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Quatman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Gaer v. Bank of BakerMontana Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API