Snyder v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The suit is for condemnation of an automobile under .the statutes. Code 1940,. Tit. 29, §§ 245 and 248; Thomas v. State,, 241 Ala. 381, 2 So.2d 772.
There is no insistence in the pleadr ing that the transportation was from a wet. county through a dry county into another wet county in the state. • Williamson v. State ex rel. Evans, 244 Ala. 609, 14 So.2d 587; Newton v. State, 241 Ala. 1, 200 So. 428, 134 A.L.R. 420. The charge is illegal transportation or conveyance of prohibited liquors or beverages from point to point in the County of Tuscaloosa, which we judicially know is a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Anderson v. State Ex Rel. DormonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- U-Haul Company of Alabama v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Deerman v. State ex rel. BainsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Davis v. State ex rel. PettusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Middlebrooks v. State Ex Rel. DormonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Modern Credit Co. v. State ex rel. ThetfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.