Davis v. Davis

THOMAS, Justice.

The appeal is from a decree denying the husband’s bill for divorce.

It will serve no good purpose to indulge in a discussion of the evidence. Code 1923, § 10336, Code of 1940, Tit. 13, § 66.

In Barley v. Wright et al., 233 Ala. 283, 171 So. 247, 248, it is declared: “The question for consideration is one of fact, and in such cases, since the passage of the Act of 1915, p. 594 (section 10336, Michie’s Code [Code 1940, Tit. 13, § 66]), it has not been the policy of this court to enter into a detailed discussion of the evidence. Caples v. Young, 206 Ala. 282, 89 So. 460. We rest…