Legal Opinion

Littrice v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 29, 2003No. 86,901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knudson, J.:

Mabel Littrice appeals from the district court’s denial of her motion filed under K.S.A. 60-1507, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Previously, in a published opinion we remanded this matter to the district court for findings of fact and conclusions of law as required under Supreme Court Rule 183(j) (2002 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 210). See Littrice v. State, 30 Kan. App. 2d 800, 48 P.3d 690 (2002). The district court has since complied with the mandate and the parties have filed supplemental briefs.

We will not recite in detail the evidence in the underlying criminal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. OrrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. State v. SperrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. State v. HedgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. HicksSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. MellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  4. State v. MellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API