Ebberle v. Mayer

We deem it unnecessary to state the pleadings in this case, as the sole question raised in the record and debated by counsel is as to the sufficiency of the description of the property in a chattel mortgage, to protect the rights of the mortgagees against the vendee of the mortgagors.

The goods were described in the mortgage as follows:

“All the stock, tools, fixtures and materials how on hand in the shop formerly occupied by said Kreber & Co., on Central Avenue, in the city of Madison, Ind., and being the *236same property this day sold to us by said Kreber & Co., as-in the invoice to us…