Legal Opinion

Tindall v. Wasson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7398PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellant instituted this action to recover certain personal property described in the complaint as “two brown female mules.” The appellee answered in four paragraphs, and the question which this appeal presents is, whether the second paragraph of the answer stated facts sufficient to constitute a defence.

The paragraph of the answer referred to contains, in substance, these allegations : That the only claim or right of the plaintiff to the property in controversy is founded upon a chattel mortgage, executed by one Gore on the 7th dav of January, 1871; that the property was described in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith & Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Duke v. StricklandIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Ebberle v. MayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. McCord v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ross v. MenefeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Reinstein v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Jennings v. SparkmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. White v. StantonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Newcomer v. HutchingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API