Legal Opinion

Bair v. Schultz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1939No. 44541PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStiger, J.

Plaintiff alleged that defendant with malicious intent and without probable cause procured an indictment against him charging that he stole “certain slabs in excess of the value of $20.00” from defendant. He asked for actual and exemplary damages.

Defendant pleaded a general denial. He further pleaded that he made a full, fair and complete disclosure to the county attorney of the facts he testified to before the grand jury and that the county attorney thereupon advised him to place his testimony before the grand jury, and relying thereon, and acting under advice of counsel, he testified before…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Center v. SpringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  2. Shaul v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  3. Krehbiel v. HenkleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Wilson v. LaphamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. White v. International Textbook Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sergeant v. Watson Bros. Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  2. Halligan v. Lone Tree Farmers ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Schnathorst v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  4. Bair v. ShoultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Boike v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API