Legal Opinion
In Re Fitak
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 31, 1990No. C2-88-905, Bankruptcy No. 2-85-00376PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Notices of Appeal and Cross Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a).
Upon careful consideration and being duly advised, this Court finds these appeals not well taken and are DENIED.
FACTS
The pertinent facts are as follows:
Debtors filed their petition under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code on February 8, 1985. Concurrently with the filing of the petition, Debtors filed their Chapter 13 Plan. At the time of the filing of the petition, Mrs. Fitak was employed by the State of Ohio Auditor’s Office, Department of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re EuerleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1987
- In Re FitakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- In Re KoonceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1985
- In Re PerkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1990
- In Re WigginsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1986
3Cited by28 opinions
- In the Matter of Ronald J. Witkowski, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Barbosa v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Powers v. Savage (In Re Powers)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Anderson v. Satterlee (In re Anderson)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- In Re BarbosaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.