Legal Opinion

United States v. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 29, 2015No. Case Nos. 2:14-mc-39; Case No. 2:12-cr-24Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES L. GRAHAM, United States District Judge

This matter is before the court on the application of the putative class plaintiffs in the case of In re Morning Song Bird Food Litigation, Case No. 3:12-cv-1592-JAH-RBB, now pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, for an order authorizing disclosure by this court’s probation office of the presentence report (“PSR”) and related documents prepared during the criminal prosecution of The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (“Scotts”) in this court. See United States v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States Department of Justice v. JulianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. Michael J. Corbitt, Pulitzer Community Newspapers, Inc., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Spotted ElkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API