Legal Opinion

United States v. Ok Soon Hogan

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 10, 2004No. CRIM.03-50065-01, CRIM.03-50069, CRIM.03-50070-01Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ (1) MOTIONS TO QUASH INDICTMENT AND (2) MOTIONS TO QUASH SEARCH WARRANT AND SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

GADOLA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court are six motions in three different, but very similar, criminal cases. The matter involves allegations of conspiracy, money laundering, racketeering, and prostitution.

The first case is United States v. Ok Soon Hogan, No. 03-50065-01. Hogan has filed (1) a motion to quash indictment and (2) a motion to quash search warrant and suppress evidence. There is one additional defendant in this case, Defendant Kil Cha…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. United States v. James H. Spikes (96-3899) Marilyn Smith (96-3660)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API