Legal Opinion

Toney v. Burgess

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 29, 1922No. 8 Div. 348PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit is for injunction to restrain foreclosure of mortgages. Respondent filed sworn answer to the bill as originally framed, incorporated demurrer therein, and moved the court to dissolve the injunction. The bill was materially amended. On final submission for decree upon demurrer and upon the motion to dissolve the injunction, “upon the coming in of the sworn answer of the respondent” the demurrer was sustained and the bill dismissed.

It is averred that W. Pink Burgess was administrator of an estate and B. J. Toney was surety on his bond as such personal representative; that said…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Caples v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Nelson v. HammondsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Profile Cotton Mills v. Calhoun Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Brown v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Franklin v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Rudisill Soil Pipe Co. v. Eastham Soil Pipe & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Cruce v. McCombsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Stout v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Holcomb v. ForsythSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API