Legal Opinion
State v. Recuenco
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 2005No. 74964-7PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
110 P.3d 188 (2005)
154 Wash.2d 156
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Arturo R. RECUENCO, Petitioner.
No. 74964-7.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued November 9, 2004.
Decided April 14, 2005.
Gregory Charles Link, Washington Appellate Project, Rita Joan Griffith, Seattle, for Petitioner.
James Morrissey Whisman, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, for Respondent.
James Elliot Lobsenz, Carney Badley Spellman, Seattle, for Amicus Curiae Wash. Ass'n of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
FAIRHURST, J.
¶ 1 Arturo Recuenco was charged with second degree assault with a deadly weapon enhancement because…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. RecuencoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.