Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1929No. 8 Div. 810Published

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

Over objection and exception of defendant seasonably reserved, the court admitted a transcript of the testimony of Johnnie James given and taken down on the preliminary hearing of this case. The predicate laid for the introduction of this evidence was as follows:

“Q. Where is he (Johnnie James) at this time? Ans. Pine Bluff,.Ark.
“Q. How long has he been there? Ans. Probably four or five months.”

No subpoena had been issued for Johnnie James, nor was there other evidence on this subject. The predicate laid was not sufficient. Hines v. Miniard, 208 Ala. 176, 94 So. 302; Kimble v. State, 21 Ala.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hines v. MiniardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Kimble v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API