Legal Opinion

Doe v. Caldwell

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided December 20, 2012No. Civil Action No. 12-1670PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

MARTIN L.C. FELDMAN, District Judge.

Before the Court are three motions: (1) the defendants’ motion to dismiss; (2) the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification; and (3) the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED and the plaintiffs’ motions for class certification and summary judgment are continued, to be reset because of inadequate briefing.

Background

This putative class action lawsuit follows this Court’s March 29, 2012 ruling in Doe v. Jindal, 851 F.Supp.2d 995 (E.D.La.2012), in which the Court…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gautreaux v. MastersDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022
  2. Robinson v. HarrisonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API