Legal Opinion

State v. Daggett

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 11, 2001No. 01-1417-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.

¶ 1. The State appeals from a pretrial order suppressing the results of a chemical analysis of Dennis Daggett's blood. We reverse the order because we conclude that the warrantless blood draw, performed by a doctor in the police booking room, was reasonable and, therefore, constitutional.

Background

¶ 2. The essential facts are undisputed. Daggett was arrested for operating while intoxicated after citizen informants contacted the police. The informants reported that Daggett had driven his car into their driveway, had driven down the middle of the road away from their residence, and had returned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. BohlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. SicklerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. ThorstadCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. JohnstonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. State v. Patrick K. KozelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Wetsch v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Christopher Wayne West v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API