Legal Opinion

In re Kent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 22, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1995. She is currently suspended from practice for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements (see, Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 273 AD2d 600 [June 15, 2000]). She recently maintained an office for the practice of law in Vermont, where she was admitted to practice in 1996.

*812By decision of the State of Vermont Professional Conduct Board dated May 30, 2000, respondent was suspended from practice in that State for a period of two years. The decision found that respondent failed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re SingiserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API