Legal Opinion
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 15, 2000PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner Committee on Professional Standards moves to suspend respondent attorneys on the ground they have failed to file a registration statement and pay the required attorney registration fee in accordance with section 468-a of the Judiciary Law and part 118 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator.
The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration and a notice sent by petitioner, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee.
Subdivision (5) of Judiciary Law § 468-a provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by36 opinions
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re EjimakorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re HedigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re KentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Matter of HedigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.