Legal Opinion

Diamond Alkali Company v. Godwin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 27, 1959No. 37922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

1. The contention presented by the motion to dismiss the petition on the grounds that the trial court does not have jurisdiction over the remaining defendant is without merit. The petition alleged that the defendant, Diamond Alkali Company, was doing business, but did not maintain a place of business within the State, and was represented only by an agent for the purpose of receiving service. In the event that a corporation does have an agent or office for the purpose of doing business within the State, the venue will be in the county where such office exists. Adams & Co. v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hardy v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. A. K. Adams & Co. v. Douglas-Coffee County Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Frick Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. LIBERTY BELL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ExumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1961
  2. F. O. Grey v. Hayes-Sammons Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. Shell v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Brown v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. DIAMOND ALKALI COMPANY v. GodwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API