State v. McClaugherty
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKennedy, Judge
{55} I fully concur that we have jurisdiction to hear this appeal, and that Section 39-1-1 does not apply to situations such as we have here. I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because this uncommon and extraordinary case represents two independent aspects, either of which merit reversing the district court; either to leave its original and proper dismissal of the case intact, or to dismiss the indictment as violating double jeopardy for the prosecutorial misconduct that occurred at trial.
{56} How common is a murder case in which: (1) the prosecution represents at trial that it…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pool v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles J. SANCHEZ, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- People v. MonterrosoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.