Legal Opinion

Southeastern Greyhound Corp. v. Graham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1943No. 30128PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

A carrier of passengers must exercise extraordinary care and diligence to protect the lives and persons of his passengers. Code, § 18-204. The liability of a common carrier for an assault by one of its employees on a passenger is not dependent on the question as to whether the employee was acting within the scope of his employment or in the line of his duty, but is based upon its broad duty as a common carrier to protect its passengers from assault. 10 Am. Jur. 264, § 1448. And where the relationship of carrier and passenger is once established, unless that relationship be terminated by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cole v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Brunswick & Western R. R. v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Wolfe v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Georgia & Florida Railway v. ThigpenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ChiversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Rubin v. Matthews International Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. Barry v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Barry v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Bricks v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API