Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 5, 1969PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, P. J.

This is a suit upon a policy of disability insurance dated May 10, 1966, providing benefits of ijtlOO.OO per month in event insured should become totally and permanently disabled.

The insurer, by its answer, defended on the ground the application submitted by complainant contained misrepresentations as to his condition of health and, particularly, that he falsely represented he had completely recovered from an operation to remove or repair a herniated spinal disc, performed in 1960. The jury made specific findings including a finding that insured is totally and permanently disabled.

Included in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. v. DibrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Little v. Washington Nat. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  3. Sloop v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965
  4. K. of P. v. RosenfieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Norvill v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n of OmahaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Womack v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Palmer W. Collins and H. L. Clark, Iii, and William M. Ables, Jr. v. Pioneer Title Insurance Co., Palmer W. Collins and H. L. Clark, III v. Pioneer National Title Insurance Co., and William M. Ables, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  3. Lane v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  4. Milligan v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  5. First Tennessee Bank National Ass'n v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API