Genthner v. Wiley
District Court, D. Massachusetts
These were cross libels for damages resulting from injuries to a barge at a dock; the first being filed by Philip J. Genthner against William Otis Wiley, and the second by Wiley against Genthner.
1Opinion of the Court
LOWELL, District Judge.
The first libel was filed by Genthner, the owner of the barge Esopus, to recover for injuries to the barge, caused by the alleged defective condition of the dock of Wiley, the consignee of the cargo. The second libel was filed by Wiley against Genthner to recover the expense incurred by Wiley in pumping out the Esopus. and in placing her in the dock so that her cargo could be discharged, and she herself should cease to obstruct the dock. The injuries to the barge Cor which Genthner sought to recover in the first libel, and which prevented the barge from lying properly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Swanzy v. WebsterDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1890
- Franklin Sugar-Refining Co. v. FunchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1896
- Franklin Sugar-Refining Co. v. FunchDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1895
- Vianello v. The Credit LyonnaisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883
- Lochmore S. S. Co. v. HagarDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United Transportation & Lighterage Co. v. New York & Baltimore Transp. LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Townsley v. BarnesonDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1898
- Morse Ironworks & Dry Dock Co. v. LuckenbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903
- Cudworth v. Panamanian Motorship The St. CuthbertDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1957