Legal Opinion

Vianello v. The Credit Lyonnais

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 8, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

A motion is made in this case that the respondents file security under the present fifty-third (formerly fifty-fourth) rule of the supreme court in admiralty.

The respondents were the consignees of certain iron imported from Europe upon the Italian bark Querini Stampalia, in December, 1881. The quantity of iron delivered being less than that described in the bill of lading, the respondents refused to pay freight, and on December 31, 1881, filed their libel in this court to recover the value of the iron not delivered.

Thereafter, on the same day, the present libelant, the master of the bark,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. United Transportation & Lighterage Co. v. New York & Baltimore Transp. LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  3. Genthner v. WileyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1898
  4. Cudworth v. Panamanian Motorship The St. CuthbertDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1957
  5. W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp. v. James Richardson & Sons, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API