Legal Opinion

Atkins v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 15, 1958No. 473-56PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

Each of the plaintiffs were enlisted men in the United States Navy or Marine Corps, and each of them were given temporary promotions to commissioned warrant officers, and were later retired as commissioned warrant officers. Subsequent to their retirement, each plaintiff was employed by defendant in a civilian position, the emoluments of which, plus his retired pay amounted to or exceeded the sum of $3,000. Since the Navy Department was of opinion that the Economy Act of 1932 (47 Stat. 406, 5 U.S.C.A. § 59a) was applicable to commissioned warrant officers, plaintiffs were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tato v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Amsden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  2. Aflague v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Seastrom v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  4. Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  5. Robert Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API