Legal Opinion

Clark v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 8, 1960No. 45-55PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

This case is before us on cross-motions for summary judgment.

Plaintiffs were enlisted men or warrant officers in the United States Navy when they received temporary appointments as warrant officers, under the authority of the Act of July 24, 1941 (55 Stat. 603). They served satisfactorily in this grade, and they were thereafter temporarily promoted to commissioned officers, again under the authority of the Act of July 24, 1941, supra. Upon the expiration of these temporary appointments, they reverted to their enlisted or warrant officer status, and upon completion of thirty years’ service…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. California Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Bander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Kutz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. HassonUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API