Legal Opinion
David Ermold v. Kim Davis
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 2, 2017No. 16-6412PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which SILER and GRIFFIN, JJ., joined. SILER, J. (pg. 720), delivered a separate concurrence.
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants David Ermold and David Moore sought a marriage license from Rowan County, Kentucky, Clerk Kim Davis. Upon being denied the license, Er-mold and Moore filed this damages-only 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Davis in both her individual and official capacities. The district court sua sponte dismissed Er-mold’s and Moore’s case after we ordered the district court to vacate a preliminary…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. George Marcus HallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Thompson v. City of OakwoodDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- David Ermold v. Kim DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Arthur Duckett v. Mary C SolkyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.