Legal Opinion
Beulah Voisin Champagne v. Penrod Drilling Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1972No. 71-3204PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON SUGGESTION FOR HEARING EN BANC
BY THE COURT:
No Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on hearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Hearing En Banc is denied.
2Per curiam
Beulah Voisin Champagne, as admin-istratrix of the estate of Paul John Le-Blanc, appeals from the judgment of the district court dismissing her action against the Penrod Drilling Company for damages under the Death on the High Seas Act. Following trial the court entered its findings of fact and conclusions of law in which…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Champagne v. Penrod Drilling CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1971
4Cited by4 opinions
- Gaudet v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Total Marine Services, Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Lorton v. Diamond M Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Stoot v. D & D Catering Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1985