Legal Opinion
Champagne v. Penrod Drilling Company
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided August 5, 1971No. Civ. A. 13800PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWIN F. HUNTER, Jr., District Judge.
This ease was tried to the Court. We enter findings and conclusions:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Terrebonne Welders employed Paul LeBlanc, deceased, as a welder and general construction worker. Terrebonne performs welding as a contract welding organization and also furnishes welders on an hourly basis to perform welding services for customers in the oil field and offshore drilling industry.
2. On or about March 7, 1968, LeBlanc and three others were sent to work on a stationary platform known as Pen-rod No. 31, owned by defendant Penrod Drilling Company.
3. Penrod is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Paul v. Ruiz v. Shell Oil Company, National Tank CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- B & G CRANE SERVICE v. Thomas W. Hooley & SonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Brown v. B & G Crane Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Touchet v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gaudet v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Dennis L. Capps v. N.L. Baroid-Nl Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Langfitt v. Federal Marine Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Total Marine Services, Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Huff v. Marine Tank Testing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.