Legal Opinion
Bouchard v. Klepacki
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 30, 1976No. 7332PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue in this paternity action under RSA ch. 168-A (Supp. 1975) is whether the trial court erred when it denied plaintiff’s motion for substituted service by publication under RSA 510:4 II (Supp. 1975), known as the “Long Arm Statute”. No exception was taken, but all questions of law were transferred by Flynn, J.
Although no exception was taken to the ruling, it presented a single issue which was plainly raised and which was transferred by ;he trial court. We therefore consider it. Kacavisti v. Sprague Electric Co., 102 N.H. 266, 155 A.2d 185 (1959); Gosselin v. Lemay, 85 N.H. 13, 18, 153…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gentry v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
- Kacavisti v. Sprague Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959
- Kinchla v. BaumnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estabrook v. WetmoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Hutchings v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Ring v. RingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977